Skip to main content

Do investment treaties unduly constrain regulatory space?

Journal article
X00128
Language:

International investment law (IIL) is at a crossroads. A large number of investment treaties and investor-state arbitrations, and rapidly expanding scholarly writing, have made IIL one of the most dynamic branches of international law. However, the proliferation of treaties and arbitrations has also made IIL a contested field, with campaigners and some experts questioning substantive standards and dispute settlement mechanisms, and commentators warning of a ‘legitimacy crisis’. Controversy about the interface between investment promotion and regulatory space has been central to these developments.

This article argues that investment treaties, even of the ‘recalibrated’ type, can have far-reaching implications for regulatory space, requiring careful thinking through. This is particularly the case in low and middle-income countries, where room for tightening regulatory frameworks may be greater, constraints on public finances harder, and capacity gaps more challenging. Ultimately, choices on the boundaries between investment promotion and regulatory space are eminently political, and a key challenge ahead is increasing democratic participation in the making of these political choices.

This article was produced under IIED’s Legal tools for citizen empowerment project.

Related links

Externally hosted publication URL (for 'X' records only)
Published:
Source publication:
Questions of International Law
Journal reference:
QIL 9 (2014), 19-31
Product code:
X00128