Browse themes
About publications

Information for X00178

Civil society and investor-state dispute settlement

International agreements to promote foreign investment, including both standalone investment treaties and investment chapters in trade and investment agreements, have attracted extensive public attention in recent years. One area of particular controversy has been the effect of investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) arrangements provided for under investment treaties. These mechanisms allow businesses to sue governments over state conduct that adversely affects them, and have raised concerns about the balance of public and private interests in international economic governance. Their potentially far-reaching implications fuelled extensive civil society advocacy in 2016.

ISDS mechanisms featured prominently in public mobilisation around three proposed trade and investment agreements: the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA), the TransPacific Partnership (TPP) and the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP). While the status of the TPP and TTIP are now in doubt given the recent political changes in the USA, ISDS proposals will remain an important issue as other deals are brokered. This includes potential agreements between the UK and other states once the UK exits the European Union, and possibly the bilateral treaties mentioned by the new Trump administration in the USA.

Publication information

Download and Sharing

Share with your network:

Cotula, L and Tan, C (2017) “Civil Society and Investor-State Dispute Settlement”, in CIVICUS, State of Civil Society Report 2017.

Project information

There are growing calls to reform international investment law, but how can we ensure that the people affected by these decisions are part of the debate?

More at www.iied.org:
Democratising international investment law

We use cookies to help improve this website. Clicking any link on this site will be taken as your consent to this.